In psychological injury and related forensic evaluations, two types of tests are commonly
used to assess Negative Response Bias (NRB): Symptom Validity Tests (SVTs) and …

Objective: Over the past two decades, there has been much research on measures of
response bias and myriad measures have been validated in a variety of clinical and …

Objective: Citation and download data pertaining to the 2009 AACN consensus statement
on validity assessment indicated that the topic maintained high interest in subsequent years …

Objective: The current study investigated changes in neuropsychologists' validity testing
beliefs and practices since publication of the last North American survey targeting these …

This study was designed to compare the validity of the Inventory of Problems (IOP-29) and
its newly developed memory module (IOP-M) in 150 patients clinically referred for …

Background: To understand the neurocognitive effects of brain injury, valid
neuropsychological test findings are paramount. Review: This review examines the research …

A growing literature indicates that to evaluate the credibility of a clinical presentation it would
be optimal to rely on multiple sources of information, and use both symptom validity tests …

Objective: To evaluate the relationships among performance validity, symptom validity,
symptom self-report, and objective cognitive testing. Method: Combat Veterans (N= 338) …

Objective: While recognition memory has been the primary tool for the assessment of
performance validity in neuropsychological evaluations, some consideration has also been …

Abstract The Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) is a recently introduced free-standing
symptom validity test (SVT) with a rapidly growing evidence base. Its classification accuracy …