Argumentation theory is a distinctly multidisciplinary field of inquiry. It draws its data,
assumptions, and methods from disciplines as disparate as formal logic and discourse …

Abstract Argumentation as the public exchange of reasons is widely thought to enhance
deliberative interactions that generate and justify reasonable public policies. Adopting an …

The article outlines a general epistemological theory of argument: a theory that regards
providingjustified belief as the principal aim of argumentation, and defends it …

An overview of the epistemological approach to argumentation, explaining what it is,
justifying it as better than a rhetorical or a consensual ist approach. systematizing the main …

The aim of this paper is to highlight an interdependence between procedural and agential
norms that undermines their neat separation when appraising argumentation. Drawing on …

'Argument'has multiple meanings and referents in contemporary argumentation theory.
Theorists are well aware of this but often fail to acknowledge it in their theories. In what …

This contribution discusses some problems of Pragma-Dialectics and explains them by its
consensualistic view of the function of argumentation and by its philosophical …

U ist-entgegen Habermas' Behauptung (DE 73; 76)-keine Argumen tationsregel. In ihm ist
von Argumentationen oder Diskursen ja uber haupt nicht die Rede. Tatsdchlich handelt es …

The article critically discusses Walton's (and co-authors') argument scheme approach to
good argumentation. Four characteristics of Walton's approach are presented: 1. Argument …

The aim of the paper is to develop a reduction of fallacy theory, ie to'deduce'fallacy theory
from a positive theory of argumentation which provides exact criteria for valid and adequate …