The study of argumentation is transversal to several research domains, from philosophy to
linguistics, from the law to computer science and artificial intelligence. In discourse analysis …

This study tackles the fake news phenomenon during the pandemic from a critical thinking
perspective. It addresses the lack of systematic criteria by which to fact-check the grey area …

While argument mining has achieved significant success in classifying argumentative
relations between statements (support, attack, and neutral), we have a limited computational …

In this paper, we present a model of pathos, delineate its operationalisation, and
demonstrate its utility through an analysis of natural language argumentation. We …

This paper proposes a theory of interpreting argument types as an integral part of a
systematic and comprehensive 'hermeneutics of persuasive discourse'. It first explains how …

A high-quality corpus is essential for building an effective legal intelligence system. The
quality of a corpus includes both the quality of original data and the quality of its …

Effective argumentation is essential towards a purposeful conversation with a satisfactory
outcome. For example, persuading someone to reconsider smoking might involve …

In their book Commitment in Dialogue, Walton and Krabbe claim that formal dialogue
systems for conversational argumentation are “not very realistic and not easy to apply”. This …

Abstract Argumentation mining aims at extracting, analysing and modelling people's
arguments, but large, high-quality annotated datasets are limited, and no multimodal …

In this paper, we formulate a procedure for assessing reasoning as it is expressed in natural
arguments. The procedure is a specification of one of the three aspects of argumentation …