As part of a broader methodological reform movement, scientists are increasingly interested
in improving the replicability of their research. Replicability allows others to perform …

Editormetrics analyses the role of editors of academic journals and their impact on the
scientific publication system. Such analyses would best rely on open, structured, and …

Very few people are happy at present with the law review publishing process, from article
submission and selection to editing. Complaints are longstanding; similar ones emerge from …

The ever-increasing competitiveness in the academic publishing market incentivizes journal
editors to pursue higher impact factors. This translates into journals becoming more …

Debate about the relative quality of various law review volumes is usually confined to
student editors' offices. On rare occasions, such discussion may spill over into the faculty …

Recent pedagogical, economic, and technological changes require law schools to
reevaluate their resource allocations. Although typically viewed in terms of curricular …

The study utilizes a unique dataset of 16,575 research papers published in 68 national
Business and Economics journals to investigate editorial bias towards insiders in Turkish …

Do academic journals favor authors who share their institutional affiliation? To answer this
question we examine citation counts, as a proxy for paper quality, for articles published in …

This paper studies academic in-group bias in the top five economics journals. We examine
citation counts for articles published in these journals during the years 2006–2015, and …

This study investigates review time and insider bias in 56,920 papers published by 258
Social Sciences journals. Results show that average review duration in Social Sciences is …