In multi-alternative elections, messages in support of or against alternatives spread across
online social media. To make decisions, individuals integrate various sources of information …

In classical elections, voters only submit their ballot once, whereas in iterative voting, the
ballots may be changed iteratively. Following the work by Wilczynski [2019], we consider the …

We consider a set of voters making a collective decision via simultaneous vote on two binary
issues. Voters' preferences are captured by payoffs assigned to combinations of outcomes …

Voting platforms can offer participants the option to sequentially modify their preferences,
whenever they have a reason to do so. But such iterative voting may never converge …

Iterative voting allows a group of agents to take a collective decision in a dynamic fashion: a
series of plurality elections are staged, making the relative scores of the candidates public …

We analyze how numerical experiments regarding elections were conducted within the
computational social choice literature (focusing on papers published in the IJCAI, AAAI, and …

We consider the problem of poll manipulation in political elections. In the context of strategic
voting, we are interested in whether a polling institute can manipulate the information it …

Majority illusion occurs in a social network when the majority of the network nodes belong to
a certain type but each node's neighbours mostly belong to a different type, therefore …

We formalize a voting model for plurality elections that combines Iterative Voting and
Calculus of Voting. Each iteration, autonomous agents simultaneously maximize the utility …

Several studies have proposed that vote tampering based on heuristic algorithms can
manipulate voters' votes. It can be found from the analysis of the poll results of the 2016 US …