En este trabajo se explorará la utilización de la lógica de los enunciados difusos a la
aplicación del estándar de la duda razonable que está presente en buena parte de los …

This Article identifies a discrepancy between law and epistemology and proposes a way to
fix it. Our legal system relies on decisions ofmultimember tribunals, which include juries …

Intentionalist theories of legal interpretation are often divided between objectivist and
subjectivist variants. The former take an interpretation to be correct depending on what the …

The power relations between state institutions can be influenced by the state institutions that
propose them, such as the appointment of United States judges who have ideological …

El artículo procura analizar las implicancias del requisito de unanimidad en la conformación
del veredicto de culpabilidad del jurado en el sistema penal. Para ello, propone un modelo …

One benefit of working with the competence of juries, as opposed to that of individual jurors,
is that the competence of juries is compatible with several distinct models of inter-juror …

Proof beyond a reasonable doubt (BARD) is one of the most fundamental requirements of
American criminal law and other legal systems. Professor Larry Laudan has criticised this …

Defendants in jury trials have the right to an impartial jury; however, no jury can be truly
impartial due to personal biases they may not even be aware of. Unfortunately, these biases …

While many of us would not want to abandon the requirement that a defendant can only be
found guilty of a serious criminal offence by a unanimous jury, we should not expect …

En este trabajo se explorara la utilizacion de la logica de los enunciados difusos a la
aplicacion del estandar de la duda razonable que esta presente en buena parte de los …