In Philosophy Within Its Proper Bounds, Edouard Machery argues that resolving many
traditional and contemporary philosophical issues is beyond our epistemic reach and that …

We examined the effects of framing and order of presentation on professional philosophers'
judgments about a moral puzzle case (the “trolley problem”) and a version of the Tversky & …

Experimental restrictionists have challenged philosophers' reliance on intuitions about
thought experiment cases based on experimental findings. According to the expertise …

This much should be uncontroversial: The method of cases plays an important role in
contemporary philosophy. While there is disagreement about how best to interpret this …

Recent evidence suggests that participants without extensive training in philosophy (so-
called lay people) have difficulties responding consistently when confronted with Robert …

Recent experimental studies indicate that epistemically irrelevant factors can skew our
intuitions, and that some degree of scepticism about appealing to intuition in philosophy is …

Whereas epistemology is (broadly speaking) the philosophical theory of knowledge, its
nature and scope, metaepistemology takes a step back from particular substantive debates …

In this paper, I present the results of an experimental study on intuitions about moral
obligation (ought) and ability (can). Many philosophers accept as an axiom the principle …

In this paper, we present the results of two surveys that investigate subjects' judgments
about what can be known or justifiably believed about lottery outcomes on the basis of …

The “received wisdom” in contemporary analytic philosophy is that intuition talk is a fairly
recent phenomenon, dating back to the 1960s. In this paper, we set out to test two …