Peer review is a process used in the selection of manuscripts for journal publication and
proposals for research grant funding. Though widely used, peer review is not without flaws …

Peer review plays an essential role in the scholarly publishing life cycle. Using the verified
peer review records of reviewers who use the Publons, we employed review length as a …

Peer review is not only a quality screening mechanism for scholarly journals. It also
connects authors and referees either directly or indirectly. This means that their positions in …

The debate on whether the peer-review system is in crisis has been heated recently. A
variety of alternative systems have been proposed to improve the system and make it …

This paper aims to examine the influence of authors' reputation on editorial bias in scholarly
journals. By looking at eight years of editorial decisions in four computer science journals …

This paper looks at peer review as a cooperation dilemma through a game-theory
framework. We built an agent-based model to estimate how much the quality of peer review …

Editors of scientific journals meet increasing challenges to find peer reviewers. Rewarding
reviewers has been proposed as a solution to incentives peer review, and journals have …

A simulation model based on parallel systems is established, aiming to explore the relation
between the number of submissions and the overall standard of academic journals within a …

长期以来, 同行评议作为学术论文发表体系及规范中的重要环节, 备受学术界的关注. 然而,
同行评议速度所象征的科学学意涵尚未得到全面的研究和阐释. 基于此, 本研究试图以二次文献 …

Authors often ask how long the peer review process takes. Peer review duration has
attracted much attention in academia in recent years. Existing research focuses primarily on …