I develop and defend the view that subjects are necessarily psychologically able to revise
their beliefs in response to relevant counter‐evidence. Specifically, subjects can revise their …

In this paper, I present the results of an experimental study on intuitions about moral
obligation (ought) and ability (can). Many philosophers accept as an axiom the principle …

Are we able to do everything we ought to do? According to the important but controversial
Ought Implies Can principle, the answer is yes. In this book Alex King sheds some much …

Philosophers have recently argued, against a prevailing orthodoxy, that standards of
knowledge partly depend on a subject's interests; the more is at stake for the subject, the …

The Value-free ideal of science (VFI) is a view that claims that scientists should not use non-
epistemic values when they are justifying their hypotheses, and is widely considered to be …

Conceptual limitations restrict our epistemic options. One cannot believe, disbelieve, or
doubt what one cannot grasp. I show how, even granting an epistemic ought-implies-can …

Philosophers debate about which logical system, if any, is the One True Logic. This involves
a disagreement concerning the sufficient conditions that may single out the correct logic …

Many philosophers claim that 'ought'implies 'can'. In light of recent empirical evidence,
however, some skeptics conclude that philosophers should stop assuming the principle …

Doxastic normativism is the thesis that norms are constitutive of or essential to belief, such
that no mental state not subject to those norms counts as a belief. A common normativist …

This paper aims to contribute to the current debate about the status of the “Ought Implies
Can”(OIC) principle and the growing body of empirical evidence that undermines it. We …