A well-designed method for evaluating scientists is vital for the scientific community. It can be
used to rank scientists in various practical tasks, such as hiring, funding application and …

Academic team formulation is one of the most critical and fundamental issues in team
research. Inspired by the Liebig's metaphor, we formulate an academic team by a barrel …

This paper investigates the impact of institutes and papers over time based on the
heterogeneous institution-citation network. A new model, IPRank, is introduced to measure …

Measuring the quality of research work is an essential component of the scientific process.
With the ever-growing rates of articles being submitted to top-tier conferences, and the …

Nowadays identifying the personal representative works is becoming increasingly important
and necessary for scientists in many cases, such as faculty hiring and promotion …

文章以代表作制度为基础, 使用h 指数核心法和representative 方法选取学者代表作, 对Prathap
提出的Z 指数原理进行改进, 探讨不同计算原理的评价效果, 并通过图书情报学领域的实证分析 …

一种多篇科技论文新颖性对比评估方法* 张吉玉1 张均胜1,2 乔晓东1 1 中国科学技术信息研究所
2 Page 1 一种多篇科技论文新颖性对比评估方法* 张吉玉1 张均胜1,2 乔晓东1 1 中国科学技术 …

Objectively evaluating representative papers in a specific scientific research field is of great
significance to the development of academia and scientific research institutions …

[Objective] This study proposes a new method for selecting representative papers,
considering their innovation and impact.[Methods] First, we designed a representative index …

The ability to identify the representative works of a researcher has important implications in a
wide range of areas, including hiring, funding, and promotion systems. In this paper, we …