Although peer review is one of the central pillars of academic publishing, qualitative
researchers' experiences of this process have been largely overlooked. Existing research …

The current publishing landscape grapples with opacity in the review process. In response,
a proposal for a blockchain-driven system is put forth to establish transparent and auditable …

The peer review process is used throughout science but has often been criticized for being
inconsistent, with decisions dependent on the peers who did the reviewing. Much of the …

Peer review is a systematic approach to assessing research. Although it is widely employed
at academic institutions and generally held in high regard by the scientific community, many …

Although peer review is one of the central pillars of academic publishing, qualitative
researchers' experiences of this process have been largely overlooked. Existing research …

ARPA-H recently started its operation with a great vision and potential to revolutionize the
biomedical field and research. To help them shape the future biomedical field and …

The advantage of no publication time lag had led to the use of preprints as research
evidence for public policy development that required a rapid response. However, the …

This article provides an overview of the major elements of a comprehensive manuscript
review. The article also illustrates some of the basic responsibilities of the reviewer and …

This year has again been a flurry of activity for journal operations, with a steady stream of
submissions against a backdrop of seismic shifts in language assessment research and …

Like all medical specialties, plastic surgery journals solicit reviews as part of the peer review
process. Two boxes are available in which to make online comments,“Reviewer Comments …