This paper addresses the problem of aggregating a number of expert opinions which have been expressed in some numerical form in order to reflect individual uncertainty vis-a-vis a …
I argue that there are self-referential keystones of self-trust that provide us with a unified theory of reason, knowledge, wisdom, autonomy, love, consensus, and consciousness …
Suppose several individuals (eg, experts on a panel) each assign probabilities to some events. How can these individual probability assignments be aggregated into a single …
M Umano, I Hatono, H Tamura - IEEE Transactions on …, 1998 - ieeexplore.ieee.org
This paper proposes improvements to pairwise group decision making based on fuzzy preference relations in three ways. First, it extends the fuzzy preference relation …
We introduce a family of rules for adjusting one's credences in response to learning the credences of others. These rules have a number of desirable features. 1. They yield the …
D Jehle, B Fitelson - Episteme, 2009 - cambridge.org
In this paper, we investigate various possible (Bayesian) precisifications of the (somewhat vague) statements of “the equal weight view”(EWV) that have appeared in the recent …
F Dietrich - Social choice and welfare, 2010 - Springer
If a group is modelled as a single Bayesian agent, what should its beliefs be? I propose an axiomatic model that connects group beliefs to beliefs of the group members. The group …
How can several individuals' probability assignments to some events be aggregated into a collective probability assignment? Classic results on this problem assume that the set of …
F Cariani - Philosophy compass, 2011 - Wiley Online Library
Judgment aggregation studies how collective opinions arise from the aggregation of individual ones. This article surveys a variety of aggregation rules (possible ways of …