Conservationists increasingly position conservation that is mutually beneficial to people and
biodiversity on the promise of empowerment of people through participatory discourse …

Social science methodologies are increasingly used by conservation organisations to
improve social‐ecological outcomes. However, ethnographic approaches seeking to …

Rigorous scientific practice relies on the tenet of transparency. However, despite regular
transparency in areas such as data availability and methodological practice, the influence of …

Biodiversity conservation work can be challenging but rewarding, and both aspects have
potential consequences for conservationists' mental health. Yet, little is known about …

Workplaces can be sources of both stress and support, affecting employees' mental health
and productivity. Yet, little research has investigated variability in workplace risk factors for …

Human–wildlife conflict (HWC) is a critical challenge to human development and well‐being
and threatens biodiversity conservation. Ideally, HWC mitigation should benefit both wildlife …

The ecosystem system services framework has potential to help clarify wildlife management
challenges at the single species scale, but existing methods struggle to capture the complex …

Social and economic position and power shape everyone, including scientists and
researchers. The way researchers do conservation science and the voices centered in the …

There is increasing interest in human-wildlife coexistence. In Europe, coexistence with
expanding large carnivore populations is a pressing issue. Seeking to inform contemporary …

Values and motivations can shape natural resource management decision-making as
individuals set conservation goals based on diverse, unique backgrounds, histories, and …