Abstract Assumption-Based Argumentation (ABA) is a form of structured argumentation with
roots in non-monotonic reasoning. As in other forms of structured argumentation, notions of …

In recent years there has been an increasing interest in extending Dung's framework to
facilitate the knowledge representation and reasoning process. In this paper, we present an …

Abstract Dung's abstract Argumentation Framework (AF) has emerged as a central
formalism in the area of knowledge representation and reasoning. Preferences in AF allow …

Abstract Dung's abstract Argumentation Framework (AF) has emerged as a central
formalism for argumentation in AI. Preferences in AF allow to represent the comparative …

We present ABA+, a new approach to handling preferences in a well known structured
argumentation formalism, Assumption-Based Argumentation (ABA). In ABA+, preference …

Abstract Dung's abstract Argumentation Framework (AF) has emerged as a central
formalism in formal argumentation. Key aspects of the success and popularity of Dung's …

Consider an argument A that is attacked by an argument B, while A is preferred to B. Existing
approaches will either ignore the attack or reverse it. In this paper we introduce a new …

A paramount, yet unresolved issue in personalised medicine is that of automated reasoning
with clinical guidelines in multimorbidity settings. This entails enabling machines to use …

It has been argued that Dung's classical Abstract Argumentation Framework (AAF) model is
not appropriate for capturing “joint attacks”, a feature that is inherent in several contexts and …

Abstract Dung's Argumentation Framework (AF) has been extended in several directions. An
interesting extension, among others, is the Epistemic AF (EAF) which allows representing …