Peer review is embedded in the core of our knowledge generation systems, perceived as a
method for establishing quality or scholarly legitimacy for research, while also often …

Research on bias in peer review examines scholarly communication and funding processes
to assess the epistemic and social legitimacy of the mechanisms by which knowledge …

Open access, open data, open source and other open scholarship practices are growing in
popularity and necessity. However, widespread adoption of these practices has not yet been …

An academic scientist's professional success depends on publishing. Publishing norms
emphasize novel, positive results. As such, disciplinary incentives encourage design …

The authors evaluate the quality of research reported in major journals in social-personality
psychology by ranking those journals with respect to their N-pact Factors (NF)—the …

The aims of this study were:(1) to evaluate the overall reproducibility and accuracy of the
International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) for assessing coronal …

Scientific peer review | Annual Review of Information Science and Technology skip to main
content ACM Digital Library home ACM home Google, Inc. (search) Advanced Search Browse …

Existing norms for scientific communication are rooted in anachronistic practices of bygone
eras making them needlessly inefficient. We outline a path that moves away from the …

Most scientific research is conducted by small teams of investigators who together formulate
hypotheses, collect data, conduct analyses, and report novel findings. These teams operate …

Human beings are primates, and primates are political animals. Our brains, therefore, are
designed not just to hunt and gather, but also to help us get ahead socially, often via …