[HTML][HTML] What is open peer review? A systematic review

T Ross-Hellauer - F1000Research, 2017 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Background:“Open peer review”(OPR), despite being a major pillar of Open Science, has
neither a standardized definition nor an agreed schema of its features and implementations …

[HTML][HTML] A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review

JP Tennant, JM Dugan, D Graziotin, DC Jacques… - …, 2017 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Peer review of research articles is a core part of our scholarly communication system. In
spite of its importance, the status and purpose of peer review is often contested. What is its …

[图书][B] Multiple imputation and its application

JR Carpenter, JW Bartlett, TP Morris, AM Wood… - 2023 - books.google.com
Multiple Imputation and its Application The most up-to-date edition of a bestselling guide to
analyzing partially observed data In this comprehensively revised Second Edition of Multiple …

Challenges, experiments, and computational solutions in peer review

NB Shah - Communications of the ACM, 2022 - dl.acm.org
Challenges, experiments, and computational solutions in peer review Page 1 76
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM | JUNE 2022 | VOL. 65 | NO. 6 review articles IMA GER YB Y …

[图书][B] Handbook of missing data methodology

G Molenberghs, G Fitzmaurice, MG Kenward, A Tsiatis… - 2014 - books.google.com
Missing data affect nearly every discipline by complicating the statistical analysis of collected
data. But since the 1990s, there have been important developments in the statistical …

Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers

T Ross-Hellauer, A Deppe, B Schmidt - PloS one, 2017 - journals.plos.org
Open peer review (OPR) is a cornerstone of the emergent Open Science agenda. Yet to
date no large-scale survey of attitudes towards OPR amongst academic editors, authors …

Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals

R Smith - Journal of the royal society of medicine, 2006 - journals.sagepub.com
One answer is that it is a method to select the best grant applications for funding and the
best papers to publish in a journal. It is hard to test this aim because there is no agreed …

Sensitivity analysis for clinical trials with missing continuous outcome data using controlled multiple imputation: a practical guide

S Cro, TP Morris, MG Kenward… - Statistics in …, 2020 - Wiley Online Library
Missing data due to loss to follow‐up or intercurrent events are unintended, but unfortunately
inevitable in clinical trials. Since the true values of missing data are never known, it is …

Reviewergpt? an exploratory study on using large language models for paper reviewing

R Liu, NB Shah - arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.00622, 2023 - arxiv.org
Given the rapid ascent of large language models (LLMs), we study the question:(How) can
large language models help in reviewing of scientific papers or proposals? We first conduct …

[HTML][HTML] How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on

JM Glanville, C Lefebvre, JNV Miles… - Journal of the Medical …, 2006 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Objective: The researchers sought to assess whether the widely used 1994 Cochrane
Highly Sensitive Search Strategy (HSSS) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in …