Through a detailed analysis that draws on work across philosophy, the law, and social
psychology, Criminal Testimonial Injustice shows that, from the very beginning of the …

Punishment policies and practices in the United States today are unprincipled, chaotic, and
much too often unjust. The financial costs are enormous. The moral cost is greater: countless …

Sentenced offenders who re-offend prior to serving their previously imposed sentence
(multiple conviction offenders) are situated between multiple and repeat offenders. This …

This chapter advances the proposition that while multiple offenders are more culpable than
single-crime offenders and should thus be treated differently, multiple offenders should not …

The multiple-conviction paradox is that punishments of people convicted of multiple offenses
are often discounted if sentences are imposed at one time but enhanced if imposed at …

The retributive conception of punishment as a process for censuring blameworthy conduct is
an important component of a complete theory of punitive justice, but by itself is not enough …

This chapter explores the interaction between risk, just desert, and character retribution
considerations in sentencing and parole. Through analyzing American and Israeli …

Abstract When the US Supreme Court decided in Graham v. Florida that the Cruel and
Unusual Punishments Clause of the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution prohibits a …

Werden Straftaten zeitlich gestreckt über eine Verurteilung hinaus begangen, soll der
Verurteilung der herrschenden Meinung zufolge eine Zäsurwirkung zukommen. Die …

It is a shared practice among various and diverse penal systems around the world to punish
recidivists more harshly than first-time offenders. Despite the breadth of this practice …