Abstract argumentation frameworks (AFs), originally proposed by Dung, constitute a central
formal model for the study of computational aspects of argumentation in AI. Credulous and …

In 1995, in his seminal paper introducing the abstract argumentation framework, Dung has
also established the first relationship between this framework and a logical framework (in …

Abstract Argumentation Theory provides tools for both modelling and reasoning with
controversial information and is a methodology that is often used as a way to give …

Powerful formalisms for abstract argumentation have been proposed, among them abstract
dialectical frameworks (ADFs) that allow for a succinct and flexible specification of the …

Abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs) constitute one of the most powerful formalisms in
abstract argumentation. Their high computational complexity poses, however, certain …

Many recent studies of dynamics in formal argumentation within AI focus on the well-known
formalism of Dung's argumentation frameworks (AFs). Despite the usefulness of AFs in many …

Epistemic graphs are a recent generalization of epistemic probabilistic argumentation.
Relations between arguments can be supporting, attacking, as well as neither supporting …

Abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs) are generalizations of Dung argumentation
frameworks where arbitrary relationships among arguments can be formalized. This …

While modelling arguments, it is often useful to represent “joint attacks”, ie, cases where
multiple arguments jointly attack another (note that this is different from the case where …

Abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs) are generalizations of Dung argumentation
frameworks where arbitrary relationships among arguments can be formalized. This …