To lose freedom of thought (FoT) is to lose our dignity, our democracy and our very selves.
Accordingly, the right to FoT receives absolute protection under international human rights …

This article reviews neuroethics issues that arise with the development, translation, and use
of technologies for neuromodulation. Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and …

Advances in new neuroscientific research tools and technologies have not only led to new
insight into the processes of the human brain, they have also refined and provided …

A central question in the current neurolegal and neuroethical literature is how brain-reading
technologies could contribute to criminal justice. Some of these technologies have already …

This paper examines claims that the convergence of AI and neurotechnology applications,
known as brain-reading, enables the reading of human minds. The purpose of this …

A pressing worry in the ongoing neurorights debate is the language used to advocate for
newly proposed rights. This paper addresses this concern by first examining the partial and …

Emerging neurotechnology offers increasingly individualised brain information, enabling
researchers to identify mental states and content. When accurate and valid, these brain …

The practice of medicine frequently involves the unconsented restriction of liberty. The
reasons for unilateral liberty restrictions are typically that being confined, strapped down, or …

When it becomes available, neuroscience-based apprehension of subjective thoughts is
bound to have a profound impact on several areas of society. One of these areas is …

Crime comes with enormous costs, not only financial but also in terms of loss of mental and
physical health and, in some cases, even loss of life. Recidivism is responsible for a …