The President claims exclusive control over diplomacy within our constitutional system. Relying on this claim, executive branch lawyers repeatedly reject congressional mandates …
The lower federal courts have been invoking" international comity abstention" to solve a range of problems in cross-border cases, using a wide array of tests that vary not just across …
Conventional wisdom suggests that a constitutional right should be defined so as to effectively constrain government actors. A right defined in terms of what state actors routinely …
Longstanding debates over the allocation of foreign affairs power between Congress and the President have reached a stalemate. Wherever the formal line between Congress and …
Reliance interests are the" dark matter" of our nation's law of interpretation: unseen, underappreciated, but exercising a strong gravitational force that cuts across doctrines and …
As presidents make ever more expansive claims of executive power, Congress's ability and willingness to counter the executive is often limited. That makes all the more significant …
J Durling, EG West - Virginia Law Review, 2019 - JSTOR
Debates about the Appointments Clause tend to turn on drawing the right distinctions. This Article argues that the Appointments Clause draws a little-recognized distinction between …
Human Rights and US Foreign Policy provides a comprehensive historical overview and analysis of the complex and often vexing problem of understanding the formation of US …
In his canonical concurring opinion in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, Justice Robert Jackson set forth a" tripartite" framework for evaluating exercises of presidential …