Predatory journals and conferences are two sides of the same coin. As here reviewed, their
deceptive practices have negative implications for scientists and clinicians, both educational …

Purpose By distorting the peer review process, predatory journals lure researchers and
collect article processing charges (APCs) to earn income, thereby threatening clinical …

Beall's list is widely used to identify potentially predatory journals. With this study, we aim to
investigate the impact of Beall's list on the perception of listed journals as well as on the …

Scientific research is communicated, organized, financed, governed, and evaluated through
the process of publication. The result of this process is a highly competitive academic …

Background Lack of effective peer-review process of predatory journals, resulting in more
ambiguity in reporting, language and incomplete descriptions of processes might have an …

Not all the journals included in credible indices meet the ethical rules of COPE, DOAJ,
OASPA, and WAME, and there may also be trustworthy journals excluded from these …

Predatory journals and conferences have little or no peer review. Their raison d'être is for
making money through the article processing charges and the conference registration fees …

Background France ranks 9th worldwide for scientific publication in orthopedics and the
increase in both the quantity and the quality of its scientific production has been described in …

The prevalence of predatory journals in orthopaedic surgery continues to increase. These
journals directly solicit authors, offering the advantages of open access and quick …

PURPOSE The aim of this study is to determine the presence and evaluate the features of
potential predatory journals in the radiology field. METHODS The presence of the keywords …