This paper criticises Miranda Fricker's account of the primary harm of testimonial injustice as
a kind of epistemic objectification, where the latter is understood on the model provided by …

A recurring concern within contemporary philosophy of language has been with the ways in
which speakers can be illocutionarily silenced, ie hindered in their capacity to do things with …

The debate about the determination of the illocutionary force of a speech act revolves
around the notion of uptake and the role played by the audience: many scholars consider …

My aim in this paper is to present and discuss a novel understanding of the nature of
epistemic vice. I highlight that epistemic vice such as excessive curiosity, gossip and …

According to speech-act theory, we do things with words every time we speak. The most
striking thing one can do with words is to exercise authority over others, such as when a …

In this paper, I focus on applying Kristie Dotson's (2011) critical social epistemological
framework to the topic of women's sexual arousal. My paper is divided into three parts. In …

Epistemic social oppressions such as 'epistemic partiality','epistemic injustice','epistemic
harms and wrongs','epistemic oppression','epistemic exploitation','epistemic violence', or …

This book offers readers a collection of 50 short chapter entries on topics in the philosophy
of language. Each entry addresses a paradox, a longstanding puzzle, or a major theme that …

Townsend and Townsend (2021) illustrate this claim with an example, the testimony of the
Kichwa People of Sarayaku—henceforth the Sarayaku people1—to the Inter-American …