When analysts adopt surrogates of actors' political preferences for purposes unanticipated
by the inventors of those measures, they often stretch (but not explicitly assess) the range of …

ABSTRACT 1hy aie some olhe mosl itporlanl legal queslions in our. ociely like 1he legal
slalus ofgqy marriage, 1he righl lo unionize, h limils of campaignJinance, 1he exlenl 1o …

This Article provides a rare comprehensive empirical assessment of oral argument outside
of the United States. Drawing on a novel dataset over twenty-six years (1995–2019) …

Panel effects have been widely studied in randomly composed panels. However, for many
courts, panel composition stays constant. Then judges become familiar with each other …

Kollegialgerichte entscheiden durch Mehrheit. Doch warum wird das demokratische
Mehrheitsprinzip bei Gerichten angewendet? Wann ist eine andere als eine einfache …

In many judicial systems--including the United States courts of appeals, the European Court
of Justice, the UK Supreme Court and the Supreme Court of Canada--a subset of judges is …

This Article provides a rare comprehensive empirical assessment of oral argument outside
of the United States. Drawing on a novel dataset over 26 years (1995–2019), comprising …

Panel Effects on Courts Around the World | The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Judicial
Behaviour | Oxford Academic Skip to Main Content Advertisement Oxford Academic Search …

Appellate courts in many countries will often use a subset of the entire appellate body to
decide cases. The United States courts of appeals, the European Court of Justice, 2 and the …

There are many real-world examples where decisions are made by a committee rather than
all of the members of a court, legislature, or other body. The members of such committees …