Despite growing evidence of widespread impacts of humans on animal behaviour, our
understanding of how humans reshape species interactions remains limited. 2. Here, we …

Camera trap technology has galvanized the study of predator–prey ecology in wild animal
communities by expanding the scale and diversity of predator–prey interactions that can be …

Rapid expansion of human activity has driven well-documented shifts in the spatial
distribution of wildlife, but the cumulative effect of human disturbance on the temporal …

Human activity and land use change impact every landscape on Earth, driving declines in
many animal species while benefiting others. Species ecological and life history traits may …

Camera traps deployed in grids or stratified random designs are a well‐established survey
tool for wildlife but there has been little evaluation of study design parameters. We used an …

Human impacts on wildlife stem from both our footprint on the landscape and the presence
of people in wildlife habitat. Each may influence wildlife at very different spatial and temporal …

Wildlife must adapt to human presence to survive in the Anthropocene, so it is critical to
understand species responses to humans in different contexts. We used camera trapping as …

Human activity affects plant and animal populations across local to global scales, and the
management of recreation areas often aims to reduce such impacts. Specifically, by …

Camera traps are increasingly used to answer complex ecological questions. However, the
rapidly growing number of images collected presents technical challenges. Each image …

Camera trapping has become an increasingly widespread tool for wildlife ecologists, with
large numbers of studies relying on photo capture rates or presence/absence information. It …