In regulating one's intellectual life, one should pay heed to the evidence. Often this is a
matter of considering which facts confirm or disconfirm some hypothesis one is considering …

The standard view says that epistemic normativity is normativity of belief. If you're an
evidentialist, for example, you'll think that all epistemic reasons are reasons to believe what …

Epistemic consequentialism is the view that epistemic goodness is more fundamental than
epistemic rightness. In this article, I examine the relationship between epistemic …

Sometimes, we face choices between actions most likely to lead to valuable outcomes, and
actions which put us in a better position to learn. These choices exemplify what is called the …

In this chapter I develop and motivate an account of epistemic autonomy as an intellectual
character virtue. In Section 9.2, I clarify the concept of an intellectual virtue and character …

A question facing nearly all private firms is whether they may keep employee pay secret.
Many think it is obvious that firms are obligated to disclose a good deal of pay information …

The aim of this chapter is to (i) examine the concept of epistemic paternalism and (ii) explore
the consequences of normative questions one might ask about it. I begin by critically …

The fact that an agent is pulled in these competing directions, claims Srinivasan, can
constitute a kind of injustice. If one goes this second route, and establishes a connection …

The most important questions in life are questions about what we should do and what we
should believe. The first kind of question has received considerable attention by normative …

According to a widely held view epistemic justification is a normative notion. According to
another widely held assumption, epistemic justification comes in degrees. Given that …