The focus of this paper is to highlight and review the evidence surrounding common intimate
partner rape (IPR) myths, their prevalence in society, and identify those who are most likely …

Juries in adversarial courts are tasked with several responsibilities. They are asked to: 1)
assess the credibility and reliability of the evidence presented; 2) deliberate; 3) and then …

This paper presents overwhelming evidence that prejudicial and false beliefs held by jurors
about rape affect their evaluation of the evidence and their decision making in rape cases …

Sexual offence disclosures are on the rise, thought to be the result of growing numbers of
prosecutions brought against well-known public figures and mobilisation of movements such …

Introduction Trial by jury is a longstanding legal tradition used in common law jurisdictions to
try the most serious of criminal cases. Yet, despite hearing the same trial evidence …

Purpose This study aims to examine whether country of residence, sex trafficking attitudes,
complainant gender, juror gender and right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) influenced juror …

Gender biases in legal decision-making: an exploration of judicial and public perceptions
across multiple offences | Emerald Insight Books and journals Case studies Expert Briefings …

Large Language Models (LLMs) could enhance access to the legal system. However,
empirical research on their effectiveness in conducting legal tasks is scant. We study …

This chapter presents a case study of a 19‐year‐old woman, whose case has become
known as 'the girl of Qatif', was kidnapped and raped by a group of men in Saudi Arabia. An …

Rape and sexual assault are unique crimes because they are mostly perpetrated against
female children, female adolescents and women. 1 In addition, both male and female victims …