Argumentative dialogue is an important process where speakers discuss a specific theme
for consensus building or decision making. In previous studies for generating consistent …

Argumentative stance classification plays a key role in identifying authors' viewpoints on
specific topics. However, generating diverse pairs of argumentative sentences across …

The warrant element of the Toulmin model is critical for fact-checking and assessing the
strength of an argument. As implicit information, warrants justify the arguments and explain …

Possessing strong argumentative writing skills is a crucial competency for academic and
professional success. Such skills enable individuals to articulate their thoughts, beliefs, and …

Many approaches exist for analysing fact checking for fake news identification, which is the
focus of this thesis. Current approaches still perform badly on a large scale due to a lack of …

Consideration of multiple viewpoints on a contentious issue is critical for avoiding bias and
assisting in the formulation of rational decisions. We observe that the current model imposes …

Each argument begins with a conclusion, which is followed by one or more premises
supporting the conclusion. The warrant is a critical component of Toulmin's argument model; …

Content Selection for Effective Counter-Argument Generation Page 1 Content Selection for
Effective Counter-Argument Generation Christopher Hidey Submitted in partial fulfillment of …