The limitations to our understanding of peer review

JP Tennant, T Ross-Hellauer - Research integrity and peer review, 2020 - Springer
Peer review is embedded in the core of our knowledge generation systems, perceived as a
method for establishing quality or scholarly legitimacy for research, while also often …

Peer-reviewing in surgical journals: revolutionize or perish?

GD Chloros, VP Giannoudis, PV Giannoudis - Annals of surgery, 2022 - journals.lww.com
The gold standard of safe-guarding the quality of published science is peer review.
However, this long-standing system has not evolved in today's digital world, where there has …

Understanding the peer review endeavor in scientific publishing

G Zhang, S Xu, Y Sun, C Jiang, X Wang - Journal of Informetrics, 2022 - Elsevier
Peer review plays an essential role in the scholarly publishing life cycle. Using the verified
peer review records of reviewers who use the Publons, we employed review length as a …

The critical role of peer reviewers: Challenges and future steps

N El-Guebaly, J Foster, A Bahji… - Nordic Studies on …, 2023 - journals.sagepub.com
The critical role of peer reviewers in the publishing process is examined. Examples of typical
challenges are provided, including the relative lack of rewards for this important task …

Measuring the developmental function of peer review: a multi-dimensional, cross-disciplinary analysis of peer review reports from 740 academic journals

D Garcia-Costa, F Squazzoni, B Mehmani, F Grimaldo - PeerJ, 2022 - peerj.com
Reviewers do not only help editors to screen manuscripts for publication in academic
journals; they also serve to increase the rigor and value of manuscripts by constructive …

Do reviewers get their deserved acknowledgments from the authors of manuscripts?

P Jia, W Xie, G Zhang, X Wang - Scientometrics, 2023 - Springer
As the gatekeeper of science, reviewers play an essential role in academic publishing by
improving the quality of papers and maintaining research integrity. In this research, we …

A tale of two'opens': intersections between Free and Open Source Software and Open Scholarship

JP Tennant, R Agrawal, K Baždarić, D Brassard… - 2020 - oa.tib.eu
There is no clear-cut boundary between Free and Open Source Software and Open
Scholarship, and the histories, practices, and fundamental principles between the two …

负责任同行评议: 何谓, 何以与何为

王贤文, 张光耀 - 中国科技期刊研究, 2022 - cjstp.cn
[目的] 对“负责任同行评议” 进行阐释, 为促进同行评议质量提升提供参考建议.[方法]
对“负责任同行评议” 进行解构; 针对什么是负责任同行评议, 为什么需要负责任同行评议 …

Motivations for performing scholarly prepublication peer review: A scoping review

M Mahmić-Kaknjo, A Utrobičić… - Accountability in …, 2021 - Taylor & Francis
Prepublication peer review is a cornerstone of science. Overburdened reviewers invest
millions of hours in this voluntary activity. In this scoping review, we aimed at identifying …

We need to talk about peer-review—Experienced reviewers are not endangered species, but they need motivation

JH Ellwanger, JAB Chies - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2020 - Elsevier
Abstract Background and Objectives Reviewer refusal is a phenomenon associated with
different causes, including reviewer fatigue, lack of time, dissatisfaction with the editorial …