Given how hard it is to recruit good reviewers who are aligned with authors in their functions,
journal editors could consider the use of better incentives, such as paying reviewers for their …

Authors often ask how long the peer review process takes. Peer review duration has
attracted much attention in academia in recent years. Existing research focuses primarily on …

A financial compensation model could incentivise peer reviewers to provide the optimal
amount of effort by rewarding them for their quality reports. Therefore, in this article, we …

Educators, developers, and other stakeholders face challenges when creating, adapting,
and utilizing virtual and augmented reality (XR) experiences for teaching curriculum topics …

В статье обобщен опыт работы авторов в качестве рецензентов на выборке более чем
ста рукописей из 12 российских и зарубежных научных журналов по информационно …

In this paper, we study the reviewer's compensation problem in the presence of quality
standard considerations. We examine a typical scenario in which a journal has to match the …

Background: Understanding review comments holds significant importance within the realm
of scientific discourse. This study aims to conduct an empirical analysis of factors associated …

Trust in the quality of scholarly publishing is vital for the integrity of science and medicine in
society. An ongoing debate about peer review has divided its participants into those who …

Scientific journals receive an increasing number of submissions and many of them will be
desk rejected without receiving detailed feedback from reviewers. In fact, the number of desk …

In a typical scenario in which a peer-reviewed journal has to match the uncertain
manuscript's quality with its quality standard, quality improvement is restricted by the …