N Clarke, N Mahadi - European Journal of Work and …, 2017 - Taylor & Francis
Both leader and follower emotional intelligence (EI) have been posited in the literature to influence leader–member exchange (LMX). We collected data from 203 independent leader …
C Martini, J Sprenger - Scientific collaboration and collective …, 2017 - iris.unito.it
Group judgments are often influenced by their members' individual expertise. It is less clear, though, how individual expertise should affect the group judgments. This paper surveys a …
SR Rad, O Roy - American Political Science Review, 2021 - cambridge.org
Rational deliberation helps to avoid cyclic or intransitive group preferences by fostering meta-agreements, which in turn ensures single-peaked profiles. This is the received view …
Descartes once argued that, with sufficient effort and skill, a single scientist could uncover fundamental truths about our world. Contemporary science proves the limits of this claim …
In this paper we argue that there is a kind of moral disagreement that survives the Rawlsian veil of ignorance. While a veil of ignorance eliminates sources of disagreement stemming …
The results of econometric modeling are fragile in the sense that minor changes in estimation techniques or sample can lead to statistical models that support inconsistent …
R Heesen, P van der Kolk - Erkenntnis, 2016 - Springer
In this paper we propose and analyze a game-theoretic model of the epistemology of peer disagreement. In this model, the peers' rationality is evaluated in terms of their probability of …
Group judgements are often–implicitly or explicitly–influenced by their members' individual expertise. However, given that expertise is seldom recognized fully and that some distortions …
This model explores consensus among agents in a population in terms of two properties. The first is a probability of belief change (PBC). This value indicates how likely agents are to …