Existing literature highlights that constitutional courts influence lawmakers' policy choices
without actively intervening in the policymaking process. Lawmakers know that courts may …

A growing theoretical literature identifies how the process of constitutional review shapes
judicial decision-making, legislative behavior, and even the constitutionality of legislation …

Scholarship engaging the controversial question of whose interpretation of the constitution
shall prevail has focused on three models: judicial supremacy, legislative supremacy, and …

This study aims to identify the main factors that drive the moral hazard behavior in all
industries and the strategies that can be used to mitigate this problem. The study employs …

Determining the allegations of a pleading is still one of the most controversial topics in US
federal civil procedure law. As the Supreme Court's statements in Twombly and Iqbal have …

Regimes that exhibit authoritarian features while still retaining some traditional democratic
institutions are on the rise. Even though such regimes have eliminated important constraints …

Appellate judges face a trade-off when deciding whether to remand cases: delegating the
decision power enables to transfer effort costs to the lower court, but may be costly in terms …