Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review

S Waffenschmidt, M Knelangen, W Sieben… - BMC medical research …, 2019 - Springer
Background Stringent requirements exist regarding the transparency of the study selection
process and the reliability of results. A 2-step selection process is generally recommended; …

Comparison of weightlifting, traditional resistance training and plyometrics on strength, power and speed: a systematic review with meta-analysis

SJ Morris, JL Oliver, JS Pedley, GG Haff, RS Lloyd - Sports Medicine, 2022 - Springer
Background Weightlifting training (WLT) is commonly used to improve strength, power and
speed in athletes. However, to date, WLT studies have either not compared training effects …

An evaluation of DistillerSR's machine learning-based prioritization tool for title/abstract screening–impact on reviewer-relevant outcomes

C Hamel, SE Kelly, K Thavorn, DB Rice… - BMC medical research …, 2020 - Springer
Background Systematic reviews often require substantial resources, partially due to the
large number of records identified during searching. Although artificial intelligence may not …

[HTML][HTML] Single-reviewer abstract screening missed 13 percent of relevant studies: a crowd-based, randomized controlled trial

G Gartlehner, L Affengruber, V Titscher… - Journal of clinical …, 2020 - Elsevier
Objectives To determine the accuracy of single-reviewer screening in correctly classifying
abstracts as relevant or irrelevant for literature reviews. Study Design and Setting We …

Guidance for using artificial intelligence for title and abstract screening while conducting knowledge syntheses

C Hamel, M Hersi, SE Kelly, AC Tricco, S Straus… - BMC Medical Research …, 2021 - Springer
Background Systematic reviews are the cornerstone of evidence-based medicine. However,
systematic reviews are time consuming and there is growing demand to produce evidence …

An exploration of available methods and tools to improve the efficiency of systematic review production: a scoping review

L Affengruber, MM van der Maten, I Spiero… - BMC Medical Research …, 2024 - Springer
Abstract Background Systematic reviews (SRs) are time-consuming and labor-intensive to
perform. With the growing number of scientific publications, the SR development process …

Research linking digital technologies to young children's creativity: An interpretive framework and systematic review

K Fielding, K Murcia - Issues in Educational Research, 2022 - search.informit.org
Creativity and technology are two vital elements of 21st century learning. Increasingly,
educational policies internationally are acknowledging the importance of developing …

What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? A systematic review of reviews and primary studies

MM Haby, JOM Barreto, JYH Kim… - Research Synthesis …, 2024 - Wiley Online Library
Rapid review methodology aims to facilitate faster conduct of systematic reviews to meet the
needs of the decision‐maker, while also maintaining quality and credibility. This systematic …

Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on team considerations, study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment

B Nussbaumer-Streit, I Sommer, C Hamel… - BMJ Evidence-Based …, 2023 - ebm.bmj.com
This paper is part of a series of methodological guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews
Methods Group (RRMG). Rapid reviews (RRs) use modified systematic review (SR) …

Few evaluative studies exist examining rapid review methodology across stages of conduct: a systematic scoping review

C Hamel, A Michaud, M Thuku, L Affengruber… - Journal of clinical …, 2020 - Elsevier
Objectives The objective is to identify studies that have assessed methodological shortcuts
for undertaking rapid reviews (RRs) and mapping these to review conduct stages and …