This paper reviews correction effectiveness, highlighting which factors matter, which do not,
and where further research is needed. To boost effectiveness, we recommend using …

Developing effective interventions to counter misinformation is an urgent goal, but it also
presents conceptual, empirical, and practical difficulties, compounded by the fact that …

Although misinformation and correction sharing is a topic that spans various domains and
disciplines, the ultimate aim of such research is to better understand how to reduce …

Individuals often continue to rely on misinformation in their reasoning and decision making
even after it has been corrected. This is known as the continued influence effect, and one of …

Background COVID-19 misinformation is a danger to public health. A range of formats are
used by health campaigns to correct beliefs but data on their effectiveness is limited. We …

Reliance on misinformation often persists in the face of corrections. However, the role of
social factors on people's reliance on corrected misinformation has received little attention …

Fake news exposure can negatively affect memory and beliefs, thus sparking debate about
whether to repeat misinformation during corrections. The once-prevailing view was that …

The scientific effort devoted to health misinformation mostly focuses on the implications of
misleading vaccines and communicable disease claims with respect to public health …

Dealing with misinformation on social media is a complex affair as platforms have to
continuously decide whether and how to moderate falsehoods and misleading content. The …

Misinformation can negatively affect cognition, beliefs, and behavior, and thus contribute to
societal disruption. Correcting misinformation can counteract these effects by updating …