A systematic clarification and defence of Sufficientarianism'having enough'as a demand of
justiceLiam Shields systematically clarifies and defends the political philosophy of …

In this paper I address the objection to sufficientarianism posed by Paula Casal and Richard
Arneson, that it is hard to conceive of a sufficiency threshold such that distribution is highly …

What is a just way of spending public resources for health and health care? Several
significant answers to this question are under debate. Public spending could aim to promote …

I. INTRODUCTION ACCORDING to sufficientarianism, justice requires that everyone has
enough. 1 This view has attracted considerable philosophical and societal support, and …

Sufficientarianism is a principle of distributive justice according to which it is important that
everyone has enough of some relevant form of advantage. Many, but not all, sufficientarian …

In all modern societies, people disagree about how to distribute the benefits and burdens
that arise from their mutual cooperation—that is, the benefits of economic resources …

In this paper, I ask what is wrong with sufficiency. I formulate a generic sufficiency principle
in relation to which I discuss possible problems for sufficientarianism. I argue against the …

Telic sufficientarianism is the view that it is better, other things equal, if people are lifted
above some sufficiency threshold of special moral importance. In a recent contribution …

Despite the prominence of thresholds and limits in theories of distributive justice, there is no
general account of their role within such theories. This has allowed an ongoing lack of clarity …

In this article, I offer an account of when and why inequality is problematic. I build this
account upon the central elements of the sufficiency view—that justice is concerned with …