Este libro aporta al debate de la concepción racional de la prueba una pieza faltante: una
teoría sobre los estándares de prueba, sus funciones, la manera en que deben ser …

Contemporary discrimination law is in crisis, both methodologically and conceptually. The
crisis arises in large part from the judiciary's dependence on comparatorsthose who are like …

Large infrastructure projects often suffer from cost and schedule overruns, mainly due to
optimism bias and strategic misrepresentation. Reference class forecasting (RCF) offers a …

THROUGH A SCANNER DARKLY: FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING AS EVIDENCE OF A
CRIMINAL DEFENDANT'S PAST MENTAL STATES1 Page 1 THROUGH A SCANNER …

For several decades, a variety of paradoxes have fascinated and frustrated legal scholars
and courts discussing evidence, procedure, and legalproof These paradoxes concern …

The legal concept of evidence is neither static nor universal. Medieval understandings of
evidence in the age of trial by ordeal would be quite alien to modern sensibilities (Ho 2003 …

Approximately twenty-five years ago, Professor Richard Lempert, reflecting on the then-
current state of evidence scholarship, noted a dramatic shift underway.'He described what …

That like cases ought to be treated alike is a basic common law principle. Judges recognize
that consistency in case outcomes is a characteristic of the rule of law. 2 Yet our civil justice …

The global coronavirus pandemic will be the defining event of 2020. The Director-General of
the World Health Organization reported that it took 67 days from the first reported case to …

A police officer approaches a car occupied by two men. The passenger, known to the officer
as a suspect in several prior crimes, fits the description of a man who robbed a nearby store …