This article reports on a conducted systematic review focused on conceptualization and
measurement methods of legal consciousness, which can be understood as the equivalent …

Psychological assessments are highly dependent on the forthrightness and sincere efforts of
examinees. In particular, evaluations in forensic settings must consider whether feigning or …

Introduction Experts frequently assess competency in criminal settings where the rate of
feigning cognitive deficit is demonstrably elevated. We describe the construction and …

Malingering is relatively common in criminal forensic evaluations as base rates of
malingering have ranged from 20% to 30%. Given that the most prevalent criminal forensic …

Forensic evaluations have advanced considerably with the development of specialized
measures validated on forensic and correctional samples. Prior to this progress, such …

Forensic assessments must always consider whether examinees are putting forth genuine
effort or seeking to feign legally relevant incapacities. Miranda abilities are no exception …

Purpose Adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) entering the legal system in the USA are at
heightened risk of being incorrectly labeled as malingering. The Inventory of Legal …

Abstract The Inventory of Legal Knowledge (ILK) is an instrument designed to detect
feigning of competency-specific knowledge deficits. Available studies have suggested the …

Evaluations of a defendant's competence to stand trial (CST) are probably the most
frequently performed forensic evaluations, with estimates in the United States ranging from …

Purpose Response style evaluation is a fundamental component of forensic examinations.
This retrospective study aims to evaluate how measures of feigning performed with …