The idea of retributive justice has played a dominant role in theorizing about punishment
over the past few decades, but many features of it—especially the notions of desert and …

Many seem to think that AI-induced responsibility gaps are morally bad and therefore ought
to be avoided. We argue, by contrast, that there is at least a pro tanto reason to welcome …

Punishment policies and practices in the United States today are unprincipled, chaotic, and
much too often unjust. The financial costs are enormous. The moral cost is greater: countless …

Lately it has become a commonplace to complain about the injustice of mass incarceration. I
share the sentiment that this phenomenon has been an injustice. But it also has become …

According to the dominant account of rights, there are two ways to permissibly kill people:
they have done something to forfeit their right to life, or their rights are outweighed by the …

According to an appealing and common view, the moral status of an action–whether it is
wrong, for example–is sometimes important in itself in terms of the moral status of other …

The justification of the reasonable doubt standard has been hotly debated in recent years.
Deontologists—including retributivists—have generally defended the standard, whilst …

This book addresses the various forms of deviance and criminality found within the
conventional food system. This system—made up of numerous producers, processors …

Negligence reminds us that we often do and cause things unawares, occasionally with
grave results. Given the lack of foresight and intention, some authors argue that people …

Since our moral and legal judgments are focused on our decisions and actions, one would
expect information about the neural underpinnings of human decision-making and action …