While the interpretability of machine learning models is often equated with their mere
syntactic comprehensibility, we think that interpretability goes beyond that, and that human …

Forensic scientists and commentators including academics and statisticians have been
embroiled in a debate over the best way to present evidence in the courtroom. Various forms …

The value of the evidence depends critically on propositions. In the second of two papers
intended to provide advice to the community on difficult aspects of evaluation and the …

Forensic scientists have come under increasing pressure to quantify the strength of their
evidence, but it is not clear which of several possible formats for presenting quantitative …

The forensic science community has increasingly sought quantitative methods for conveying
the weight of evidence. Experts from many forensic laboratories summarize their findings in …

Forensic science evidence has long been accepted in court and is widely considered
infallible. However, the forensic sciences have recently come under intense scrutiny, as …

Forensic scientists endeavour to explain complex scientific principles to legal decision-
makers with limited scientific training (eg, police, lawyers, judges, and jurors). Much of the …

Identifying individuals from biological mixtures to which they contributed is highly relevant in
crime scene investigation and various biomedical research fields, but despite previous …

This Element examines progress in research and practice in forensic authorship analysis. It
describes the existing research base and examines what makes an authorship analysis …

Juries in adversarial courts are tasked with several responsibilities. They are asked to: 1)
assess the credibility and reliability of the evidence presented; 2) deliberate; 3) and then …