Collaborative intellectual engagement is held in high regard in contemporary educational
thought as a pedagogical practice of broad value to K–12 students. To what extent is this …

Although collaboration is often considered a beneficial learning strategy, research
examining the claim suggests a much more complex picture. Critically, the question is not …

Research suggests that English as a foreign language (EFL) students' argumentative writing
benefits from interactions with peers. However, finding an ideal partner to interact with can …

Reason, we are told, is what makes us human, the source of our knowledge and wisdom. If
reason is so useful, why didn't it also evolve in other animals? If reason is that reliable, why …

This article investigates youth judgments of the accuracy of truth claims tied to controversial
public issues. In an experiment embedded within a nationally representative survey of youth …

There is increasing consensus among psycho-educational scholars about argumentation as
a means to improve student knowledge and understanding of subject matter. In this article …

Names: Mercer, Neil, editor.| Wegerif, Rupert, 1959-editor.| Major, Louis,(Louis Christopher),
1985-editor. Title: The Routledge international handbook of research on dialogic …

" Despite quite some variation in its numerous manifestations, three core features of
deductive reasoning seem to stand out. They are aptly captured in the following definition of …

Less than it is an individual ability or skill, critical thinking is a dialogic practice people
engage in and commit to, initially interactively and then in interiorized form with the other …

Cover--Half-title--Title page--Copyright--Dedication--Table of contents--List of Tables and
Figures--Tables--Figures--Foreword--Preface--References--Acknowledgements--1 …