Sealing the gateways for post-truthism: Reestablishing the epistemic authority of science

D Kienhues, R Jucks, R Bromme - Educational Psychologist, 2020 - Taylor & Francis
Science's role in society is being threatened, as misinterpretation and denial of scientific
evidence and the rejection or ignorance of scientific expertise are gaining prominence. This …

Constraints and affordances of online engagement with scientific information—A literature review

F Hendriks, E Mayweg-Paus, M Felton… - Frontiers in …, 2020 - frontiersin.org
Many urgent problems that societies currently face—from climate change to a global
pandemic—require citizens to engage with scientific information as members of democratic …

When preservice teachers' prior beliefs contradict evidence from educational research

E Thomm, B Gold, T Betsch… - British Journal of …, 2021 - Wiley Online Library
Background Knowledge from educational research frequently contradicts preservice
teachers' prior beliefs about educational topics. Such contradictions can seriously affect their …

Informiertes Vertrauen: Eine psychologische Perspektive auf Vertrauen in Wissenschaft

R Bromme - Wissenschaftsreflexion, 2020 - brill.com
Im Januar 2019 veröffentlichte ein pensionierter Lungenfacharzt eine Erklärung, in der er
die geltenden Regeln für Grenzwerte bei Stickstoffdioxid, verursacht durch Autoabgase, als …

Informed reflexivity: Enacting epistemic virtue

M Weinstock, D Kienhues, FC Feucht… - Educational …, 2017 - Taylor & Francis
To discuss reflexive practice in relation to epistemic cognition, we posit informed reflexivity
as an epistemic virtue that is informed by its particular context and purposes of knowing and …

Effects of raising student teachers' metacognitive awareness of their educational psychological misconceptions

S Pieschl, J Budd, E Thomm… - Psychology Learning & …, 2021 - journals.sagepub.com
Fostering metacognitive awareness of misconceptions should enhance deep processing of
scientifically correct explanations and thereby decrease misconceptions. To explore these …

Argumentation and interdisciplinarity: reflections from the Oxford Argumentation in Religion and Science Project

S Erduran, L Guilfoyle, W Park, J Chan… - Disciplinary and …, 2019 - Springer
Abstract Argumentation has emerged as a key area of research and development in science
education in recent years. Simply defined, argumentation is about the justification of …

Why do experts disagree? The role of conflict topics and epistemic perspectives in conflict explanations

E Thomm, S Barzilai, R Bromme - Learning and Instruction, 2017 - Elsevier
The present study examined the role of conflict topics and individual differences in epistemic
perspectives (absolutism, multiplism, and evaluativism) in students' explanations of expert …

Science understanding between scientific literacy and trust: contributions from psychological and educational research

F Hendriks, D Kienhues - Science communication, 2019 - degruyter.com
In this article, we describe how laypeople are able to engage with science and scientific
issues in spite of their bounded understanding (limited relevant background knowledge …

Firsthand or secondhand data in school labs: It does not make a difference

B Priemer, S Pfeiler, T Ludwig - Physical Review Physics Education Research, 2020 - APS
We report the findings of an empirical study that investigated whether the source of data—
firsthand or secondhand data gained from lab work experiments—has an influence on …