Agri‐environmental schemes (AESs) are increasingly implemented to promote the adoption
of environmentally friendly practices by farmers. We use a systematic review to explore the …

A better understanding of why EU farmers choose to join agri-environmental schemes
(AESs) is vital to help policy makers design programmes that would be more attractive to …

This article shows that the introduction of a conditional collective bonus in an agri-
environmental scheme (AES) can improve farmers' participation and increase land …

Agri‐environmental schemes (AES) have had a limited effect on European agriculture due to
farmers' reluctance to participate. Information on how farmers react when AES …

Danish farmers have been far less interested in agri-environmental subsidy schemes (AES)
than anticipated. In order to examine how to improve the appeal of such schemes, a choice …

Influencing farmers to make positive contributions to the environment is one of the goals of
agri-environment schemes (AESs). Understanding the drivers of farmer behaviour and the …

Agro-environmental schemes (AES), which pay farmers to adopt greener practices, are
increasingly important components of environmental and agricultural policies both in the US …

Agricultural intensification and landscape homogenisation are major drivers of biodiversity
loss in European agricultural landscapes. Improvements require changes in farming …

There is a growing literature reporting the extent of transaction costs for environmental
policies. However understanding why transaction costs occur and why they are small or …

Payments for ecosystem services (PES) programs aim to improve environmental outcomes
by providing direct incentives to land managers for the provision of ecosystem services …