Human reasoning has been shown to overly rely on intuitive, heuristic processing instead of
a more demanding analytic inference process. Four experiments tested the central claim of …

Dual process theories conceive human thinking as an interplay between heuristic processes
that operate automatically and analytic processes that demand cognitive effort. The …

Human reasoning has been characterized as an interplay between an automatic belief-
based system and a demanding logic-based reasoning system. The present study tested a …

In this study, we examine the belief bias effect in syllogistic reasoning under both standard
presentation and in a condition where participants are required to respond within 10 …

In this paper, I show that the question of how dual process theories of reasoning and
judgement account for conflict between System 1 (heuristic) and System 2 (analytic) …

Dual-process theories come in many forms. They draw on the distinction between
associative, heuristic, tacit, intuitive, or implicit processes (System 1) and rule-based …

When the validity of a deductive conclusion conflicts with its believability people often
respond in a belief-biased manner. This study used response times to test the selective …

Humans appear to reason using two processing styles: System 1 processes that are quick,
intuitive, and effortless and System 2 processes that are slow, analytical, and deliberate that …

Popular dual process theories have characterized human thinking as an interplay between
an intuitive-heuristic and demanding-analytic reasoning process. Although monitoring the …

Integrating a decade-long program of empirical research with current cognitive theory, this
book demonstrates that psychological research has profound implications for current …