The large-scale multiattribute group decision-making (LMGDM) consisting of at least 20
experts has been widely popular in recent years. Although lots of efforts have been spent on …

There are more complex heterogeneous preference expressions and methods (HPEMs) in
heterogeneous multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM) with several attribute sets …

Large-scale multiattribute group decision-making (LMGDM) requires a large number of
participants with different knowledge structures. This study proposed an LMGDM consensus …

The systematic clustering analysis based weight determination methods are suitable for the
experts of complex multiattribute large-group decision-making (CMALGDM) in …

In practical multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problems, it is common to utilize
heterogeneous representation forms to express distinct preference information for different …

The existing multiattribute group decision making methods with interval-valued intuitionistic
fuzzy (IVIF) sets only consider weights of the experts who participated in decision making …

The construction of belief intervals is crucial for decision-making in multi-attribute group
information integration. Based on multi-adjoint and evidence theory, an approach to multi …

In multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM), it is preferable that the set of experts
reach a high degree of consensus amongst their opinions before applying a selection …

In the complex multi-attribute large-group decision making (CMALGDM) problems where
attribute values are interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (IVIFNs), the number of …

The complex multi-attribute large-group decision-making problems that are based on
interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information have become a common topic of research in …