Most railway level crossings in high-traffic road environments are actively protected and
safest when exposure is taken into account, supporting the rail industry's strategy to focus on …

Heavy vehicle–train collisions have the potential to be catastrophic in terms of fatalities,
environmental disaster, delays in the rail network, and extensive damage to property. Heavy …

Contrary to the declining number of fatalities due to train–vehicle collisions at highway-rail
grade crossings, the number of pedestrian and bicycle fatalities at highway-and pathway-rail …

Rail level crossings (RLXs) represent a key strategic risk for railways worldwide. Despite
enforcement and engineering countermeasures, user behaviour at RLXs can often confound …

The number of pedestrian victims at Australian and foreign level crossings has remained
stable over the past decade and it continues to be a significant problem. To examine the …

In 1995, legislation was passed by the 74th State Legislature of Texas requiring the Texas
Department of Transportation to install and operate automated enforcement systems at up to …

Aim: Collisions between trains and pedestrians are the most likely to result in severe injuries
and fatalities when compared to other types of rail crossing accidents. Currently, there is a …

Many rail level crossings (RLXs) have only passive protection, such as static signs
instructing road users to stop, yield, or look for trains. Stop signs have been suggested as a …

The purpose of the project was to identify human factors that contribute to the
highway/railway grade crossing accidents and to recommend countermeasures based on …

Each year numerous pedestrian and bicyclist crashes involving high injury levels are
reported at highway–rail grade crossings (HRGCs) across the United States. Such crashes …